This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:44, November 12, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
I just made a revision and then unrevisoned it... not because it was wrong, but because much of this entire article is suspect. The grammar is a mess in quite a few places. It really makes one wonder just how much of any of this is factual. It's one thing to play around colloquially (like I did just before) in a more casual, non-professional format, but it's another when the mistakes speaks of someone pushing an agenda or one trying to convey a thought in what is not their main language. For an added layer of fun, those two things may not be mutually exclusive for a topic as politically charged as this.
Soo, what's up? What's going on here? Is there an authority purveying this section that could help settle the discrepancies?
!
Actually, just now, my peripheral also caught a glimpse of "This article contains a translation of 新左翼 (日本) from ja.wikipedia." I don't feel great editing the grammar of a translation when the translated material seems so charged. It's hard to grasp where one should apply neutral language if the they possess no understanding of the material present. I feel like there should be a button to summon a translator to better settle this. 100.35.133.16 (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]